Adam Majer <[email protected]> writes: > The (my?) expectation is that a *.asc file is a detached signature. > That's why GPG is warning when it is not a detached signature. But I can > live with .sha256.asc if there is no .sha256 ;)
Right, aren't detached signatures preferred in general? Or am I misremembering some gpg folklore? d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list [email protected] https://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch
