On Thu 2019-05-30 02:18:57 +0000, Rollins, Jameson wrote:
> I understand that this fix is for multipart/encrypted messages, but I'm
> not sure I would call the repair function itself a "crypto function".
> Given that I can imagine more repair functions in the future, would it
> make sense to break them out into their own library?

I agree that this technically isn't a "crypto function", and as such
might not belong where i've put it.  What would you think about
util/repair.{c,h} or util/demangling.{c,h} ?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

notmuch mailing list

Reply via email to