Jameson Graef Rollins <jroll...@caltech.edu> writes:

> On Sat, Sep 14 2019, David Bremner <da...@tethera.net> wrote:
>> Jameson Graef Rollins <jroll...@caltech.edu> writes:
>>> Can we have notmuch auto-apply a tag, like the "encrypted" and "signed"
>>> tags, that indicates mail has been mangled in this way?  I'm feeling
>>> somewhat morally opposed to just silently fixing mail that's been broken
>>> by bad/irresponsible actors on the net.  We need to keep pushing on MS
>>> to fix this issue globally, so I for one would like to be reminded if
>>> I'm still being affected by this.
>> It's side point, but it should rather be a property than a tag if we do
>> something like that. In hindsight I think "auto tags" were probably a
>> design mistake, since they are (easily) mutable by users.
> Right, sorry, yes it should be a property.  I agree.
> Any reason not to move "encrypted" and "signed" to be properties as
> well?

I guess it would require some client code to be adapted. I'm not sure
what really relies on those tags other than ad hoc searches.

notmuch mailing list

Reply via email to