Tomi Ollila <[email protected]> writes: > So, AFAIU, you got 124 since timeout(1) exited with that status (and > killed all parallel(1) executions (after 2 minutes in that case?)... > ... and when you set NOTMUCH_TEST_TIMEOUT=0 then timeout(1) was not > executed and a test hung (probably T355-smime).
That sounds right. > In any way you get it again to hung state (w/o using timeout(1) to > mess around) you probably can peek things with ps, /proc, strace, > gdb, or with some other (potentially more sophisticated ;) tools. In fact it looks like I already reported this issue (or a different issue causing T355 to hang, which seems less likely) at id:[email protected] Past me seems to have thought it was some kind of gpgsm failure. I would welcome input from people use or understand gpgsm. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
