Without the proposed fix for deletion performance [1], this test is
probably unreasonably slow compared to others at the same
small/medium/large scale.

[1]: id:[email protected]
---
 performance-test/T00-new.sh | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/performance-test/T00-new.sh b/performance-test/T00-new.sh
index a14dd13f..53de1c27 100755
--- a/performance-test/T00-new.sh
+++ b/performance-test/T00-new.sh
@@ -26,6 +26,16 @@ perl -nle 'rename "$_.renamed", $_' $manifest
 
 time_run "new ($count mv back)" 'notmuch new'
 
+xargs tar cf backup.tar < $manifest
+
+perl -nle 'unlink $_; unlink $_.copy' $manifest
+
+time_run "new ($count rm)" 'notmuch new'
+
+tar xf backup.tar
+
+time_run "new ($count restore)" 'notmuch new'
+
 perl -nle 'link $_, "$_.copy"' $manifest
 
 time_run "new ($count cp)" 'notmuch new'
-- 
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
notmuch mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to