Felipe Contreras <felipe.contre...@gmail.com> writes: > We don't need a FileNames enumerable object only for a small number of > strings, > we can just get them directly. > > This iterator is meant to be transient and works only once, so we better just > iterate it once. > > This is the same approach I took with the Tags object, I was waiting for > feedback on that approach but since there isn't any and there's no reason this > shouldn't work, here's the same for Filenames.
Hi Felipe; I still haven't had a chance to look at the proposed changes, but I did wonder what your plan was as far as migration. Usually with the library itself we try to provide fairly smooth upgrades. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org