Michael J Gruber <michaeljgruber+grubix+...@gmail.com> writes: > > Yes, that's why I wrote "ignore". Something like NOTMUCH_IGNORE_TESTS > which runs the test, outputs the diff on fail, but "succeeds" without > counting towards pass/fail, and reports the number of ignored > pass/fail separately - basically "known_broken" without the > "known/expectation". > > I just don't know whether it's worth it. Other folks disable a whole > test suite when they want to get a package update going ...
I guess it would be mainly interesting for distro packagers, or I guess people who wanted to run come kind of CI. Without looking at the code, I think just ignoring the return value would be relatively easy, while keeping track of ignored tests might be a bit more work. Maybe Tomi has a clearer idea / finds this a fun problem. d _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
