Marc Fargas <teleni...@telenieko.com> writes: > Hi, > > El lun. 17 de jun. 2024, Marc escribió: >> >> El lun. 17 de jun. 2024, Michael escribió: >>>> (...) >>> >>> Does this depend on emacs version by any chance, i.e. is >>> `without-restriction` defined on all emacsen? In Fedora's copr >>> infrastructure, all builds succeed but some tests fail with >>> `Symbol'€™s function definition is void: without-restriction`. The >>> picture is the following: > > So, I will have to update the patch in order to make the use of > `without-restriction` conditional on its availability. > > I asked on Emacs chat @ Matrix on how to do this nicely and yantar92 > (org contributor) proposed the following macro: > > (defmacro notmuch--without-restriction (&rest body) > "Run BODY within `without-restriction', when it is available." > (declare (debug (body))) > (if (fboundp 'without-restriction) > `(without-restriction ,@body) > `(progn ,@body)))
Assuming fboundp works for macros (without-restriction is a macro), then sure _______________________________________________ notmuch mailing list -- notmuch@notmuchmail.org To unsubscribe send an email to notmuch-le...@notmuchmail.org
