You're confusing issues, yours is a performance issue, not a correctness issue.
Maarten. On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Hervé Cauwelier <[email protected]> wrote: > Ben Skeggs a écrit : >> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 21:55 +0100, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >>> - I'm surprised we didn't get serious complaints about not being able to >>> render to the frontbuffer. >> We don't get serious complaints because it's not an issue. EXA is given >> the virtual address, and it remembers it. The design of the mm >> guarantees the virtual address of the buffer won't change, map()/unmap() >> are there merely for synchronisation of CPU/GPU access. >> >> In the "classic" case, exaMarkSync()/exaWaitSync() do the >> synchronisation job as we don't use prepare/finish_access(). >> >> Ben. > > I didn't complain because I think you have more important issues to > address, but I spend half of my work day on gnome-terminal and waiting a > couple of seconds when switching windows or desktops is rapidly > annoying. And no, I can't replace it because it's configured for my > needs and I heavily use the tabs. > > If the bug could be addressed in gnome-terminal, I can work with them on > Gnome's bugzilla, with any detail you could give to me. > > For now, I use a branch with Maarten's patches from February the 12th. > > Hervé > _______________________________________________ > Nouveau mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
