On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 10:04 +0100, Luca Barbieri wrote: > > IMO, the changes are good. However, DRM_NOUVEAU_HEADER_PATCHLEVEL is > > used to indicate the version of the kernel interface that's supported, > > and not the libdrm API version. > > OK. > > Perhaps it would be useful to add a libdrm API version number as well? Other drivers use the libdrm version number itself, which we'll also start doing once we have a stable kernel API and are doing releases.
Ben. _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
