On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 09:24 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:51 AM, Ben Skeggs <[email protected]> wrote: > > So, with all the nouveau_class.h changes lately it's become rather > > difficult to keep libdrm synced up with a particular mesa version. > > > > This is much like what happens when we break our kernel ABI, but on a > > far more regular basis so it has a larger impact. > > > > I'm proposing we drop nouveau_class.h from libdrm again, and move it > > back to the ddx and mesa trees where it can be updated at the same time > > the code that uses it is. > > > > Any objections / other suggestions? > > As long as it's autogenerated and not manually modified, it's fine by me. Of course, I'm not proposing changing from how we currently generate nouveau_class.h from renouveau at all, just that we ship a version with the ddx/mesa that matches what the code actually uses.
Ben. > > > > > Ben. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Nouveau mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau > > _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
