On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Michel Hermier <[email protected]> wrote: > Just for my personnal information, how did you benchmarked ? By juging the > fps ? >
These 3 games have built-in benchmark/demo system so I just used it. 20 dec : no patch 840 frames 6.6 seconds 126.4 fps 3.0/7.9/60.0/2.7 ms 931 frames 15.2444695 seconds 61.0713283 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 34 71 135 (44 seconds) 9.655401 / 29.729643 / 113.846779 fps -- Score = 29.773331 rand[1490382222] 20 dec : begin ring patch 840 frames 6.7 seconds 126.2 fps 4.0/7.9/59.0/2.7 ms 931 frames 15.4498180 seconds 60.2596096 fps, one-second fps min/avg/max: 33 70 133 (44 seconds) 9.668166 / 29.757431 / 117.643478 fps -- Score = 29.799963 rand[1490382222] I usually see a variation of 0.5 - 1 fps between consecutive runs. I don't know if nvfx is more performant on nv40 / pci express, so anyone with the hardware is also welcome to test. > If you have the binaries could you also comparbinary size (for > reference/culture) > I cannot see a difference, but I don't usually look at binary size so feel free to check. _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
