On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 20:46 +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > The code was supposed to print registers around 0x405018 (which is read > earlier), not 0x405818. Thanks, pushed.
Ben. > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c > index 37e21d2..c75cff1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nv50_graph.c > @@ -912,10 +912,10 @@ nv50_pgraph_trap_handler(struct drm_device *dev, u32 > display, u64 inst, u32 chid > printk("\n"); > NV_INFO(dev, "PGRAPH - TRAP_CCACHE %08x %08x %08x %08x" > " %08x %08x %08x\n", > - nv_rd32(dev, 0x405800), nv_rd32(dev, 0x405804), > - nv_rd32(dev, 0x405808), nv_rd32(dev, 0x40580c), > - nv_rd32(dev, 0x405810), nv_rd32(dev, 0x405814), > - nv_rd32(dev, 0x40581c)); > + nv_rd32(dev, 0x405000), nv_rd32(dev, 0x405004), > + nv_rd32(dev, 0x405008), nv_rd32(dev, 0x40500c), > + nv_rd32(dev, 0x405010), nv_rd32(dev, 0x405014), > + nv_rd32(dev, 0x40501c)); > > } > _______________________________________________ Nouveau mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
