Le 18/04/2011 00:32, Ben Skeggs a écrit :
On Sun, 2011-04-17 at 17:10 +0200, Martin Peres wrote:
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_perf.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_perf.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_perf.c
index 950caba..d64a98a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_perf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_perf.c
@@ -177,9 +177,9 @@ nouveau_perf_init(struct drm_device *dev)
#define subent(n) entry[perf[2] + ((n) * perf[3])]
perflvl->fanspeed = 0; /*XXX*/
perflvl->voltage = entry[2];
- perflvl->core = (ROM16(subent(0))& 0xfff) * 1000;
- perflvl->shader = (ROM16(subent(1))& 0xfff) * 1000;
- perflvl->memory = (ROM16(subent(2))& 0xfff) * 1000;
+ perflvl->core = (ROM16(subent(3))& 0xfff) * 1000;
+ perflvl->shader = (ROM16(subent(3))& 0xfff) / 2 * 1000;
+ perflvl->memory = (ROM16(subent(5))& 0xfff) * 1000;
Um, NACK. This is *definitely* very very wrong on NVA8, which uses
version 0x40 of this table too.
Ben.
Crap, I would have sworn this table was introduced for Fermi! Sorry for
the noise then, I'll try to find a fix for that (other than looking at
the codename).
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau