On 04/09/2013 03:52, Ben Skeggs wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Martin Peres <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Martin Peres <[email protected]>
This is safe because ptherm hasn't been configured yet and will be a
little further down the initialization path. Ptherm should be safe
regarding to runtime reconfiguration.
Any objections to instead sticking the ACK in a single fini() hook
(along with additional code to disable all therm interrupts), and
having the IRQ handle silently ignore any non-requested IRQs (see what
the copy engine irq handler does, for example)?
Ben.
Hi Ben,
Sorry for the late answer. This all perfectly make sense. Please have a
look at the patches I've just sent.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
