On 09/24/2015 12:00 AM, Martin Peres wrote:
On 24/09/15 00:20, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
Only the core clock is currently supported.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>
---
drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gf100.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gf100.c
b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gf100.c
index a52b7e7..807305a 100644
--- a/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gf100.c
+++ b/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/clk/gf100.c
@@ -462,5 +462,5 @@ gf100_clk_new(struct nvkm_device *device, int
index, struct nvkm_clk **pclk)
return -ENOMEM;
*pclk = &clk->base;
- return nvkm_clk_ctor(&gf100_clk, device, index, false,
&clk->base);
+ return nvkm_clk_ctor(&gf100_clk, device, index, true, &clk->base);
}
What changed that suddenly made reclocking OK? You really need to
prove it is and a few hours of testing are not enough ;)
Make sure that the clock tree is parsed correctly, then programmed
correctly. Make sure that reclocking while the card is being used is
also kind of stable, at least on your card.
After that, you may enable it and test on more Fermis. Until then,
this patch is premature, at best.
Yeah, this is probably a kind of experimental feature for now, but even
if I didn't check a lot, it seems to be stable (with heaven at least).
Anyways, I'll do more checks to prove that is going to work as expected.
Thanks for your feedbacks Martin.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
Nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
