On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Tobias Klausmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> On 02.10.2016 20:26, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>
>> That's very odd. LoadPropagation should have picked that up even in
>> its current form. Should try to figure out why it didn't and that is
>> likely to "fix" a *lot* more situations.
>
>
> Actually i was coming from an, given really constrained, addition to the
> LoadPropagation pass, where i was told to fix it within OP_MAD :/

Why doesn't LoadPropagation handle it as-is?
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau

Reply via email to