https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103202
--- Comment #3 from [email protected] ---
> I'm told that tearing with reverse prime is expected.
That would still be a bug then though? Clearly some form of synchronization
should be supported.
It seems there is some work on getting synchronization to work with PRIME
<https://www.x.org/wiki/Events/XDC2016/Program/xdc-2016-prime-sync.pdf>; not
sure what the current status of that is. Some sites make it sound like using
the NVidia card with the proprietary drivers as primary actually can get you
V-sync on both screens, so is this just a matter of getting the nouveau DRM
driver hooked up to that infrastructure?
> if you were to flip them around and run the nvidia board as primary, you'd
> see tearing on the intel-connected screen.
Possible; I would then also have really bad battery life with no external
screen connected as the NVidia card would keep running.
> -intel/radeon both offer the option to stage that copy into a back buffer for
> flipping to avoid the tear
Given that the Intel card is the primary here, that wouldn't really help,
right? I would expect to need such an option for whatever drives the NVidia
card.
> X tears by default.
Well, yes, but with reverse PRIME I get tearing even if the application uses
V-Sync or if I use a compositor. So, this is not about a lack of
synchronization per default, it is about synchronization never happening even
when using the appropriate APIs.
I wouldn't mind looking into Wayland, but found no indication that reverse
PRIME is supported there at all.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
