(re-sending as plain text)
NACK. The before and after of this patch are functionally identical. The
if-block returns unconditionally ("return priv;"), so the kfree will
only ever be reached if the condition in the if-statement evaluates to
false. Explicitly writing out an else-block is thus superfluous.
Op 03-01-2020 om 09:10 schreef wuxu.wu:
Hi, I think there has a incorrect kfree in pcirom_init function. In
pcirom_init function priv porinter could be free only when priv != null
and priv->rom is null.
Signed-off-by: wuxu.wu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c
index 9b91da0..d776e01 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c
@@ -70,8 +70,9 @@ pcirom_init(struct nvkm_bios *bios, const char *name)
(priv->rom = pci_map_rom(pdev, &priv->size))) {
priv->pdev = pdev;
return priv;
+ } else {
+ kfree(priv);
}
- kfree(priv);
}
pci_disable_rom(pdev);
}
_______________________________________________
Nouveau mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/nouveau
