On Wed, 26 Jan 2022, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com> wrote:
> Remove the trailing semicolon, as correctly warned by checkpatch:
>
>       -:1189: WARNING:TRAILING_SEMICOLON: macros should not use a trailing 
> semicolon
>       #1189: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c:119:
>       +#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, 
> yesno(info->display.name));
>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demar...@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index 93b251b25aba..94da5aa37391 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ void intel_device_info_print_static(const struct 
> intel_device_info *info,
>       DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(PRINT_FLAG);
>  #undef PRINT_FLAG
>  
> -#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, 
> yesno(info->display.name));
> +#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, 
> yesno(info->display.name))
>       DEV_INFO_DISPLAY_FOR_EACH_FLAG(PRINT_FLAG);
>  #undef PRINT_FLAG
>  }

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center

Reply via email to