On April 27, 2023 3:50:06 PM PDT, Karol Herbst <kher...@redhat.com> wrote: >On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 12:46 AM Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Hey Linus, Kees. Responses below >> >> On Sun, 2023-04-23 at 13:23 -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> > On April 23, 2023 10:36:24 AM PDT, Linus Torvalds >> > <torva...@linux-foundation.org> wrote: >> > > Kees, >> > > I made the mistake of upgrading my M2 Macbook Air to Fedora-38, and >> > > in the process I got gcc-13 which is not WERROR-clean because we only >> > > limited the 'array-bounds' warning to gcc-11 and gcc-12. But gcc-13 >> > > has all the same issues. >> > > >> > > And I want to be able to do my arm64 builds with WERROR on still... >> > > >> > > I guess it never made much sense to hope it was going to go away >> > > without having a confirmation, so I just changed it to be gcc-11+. >> > >> > Yeah, that's fine. GCC 13 released without having a fix for at least one >> > (hopefully last) known array-bounds vs jump threading bug: >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109071 >> > >> > > And one of them is from you. >> > > >> > > In particular, commit 4076ea2419cf ("drm/nouveau/disp: Fix >> > > nvif_outp_acquire_dp() argument size") cannot possibly be right, It >> > > changes >> > > >> > > nvif_outp_acquire_dp(struct nvif_outp *outp, u8 dpcd[16], >> > > >> > > to >> > > >> > > nvif_outp_acquire_dp(struct nvif_outp *outp, u8 >> > > dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE], >> > > >> > > and then does >> > > >> > > memcpy(args.dp.dpcd, dpcd, sizeof(args.dp.dpcd)); >> > > >> > > where that 'args.dp.dpcd' is a 16-byte array, and DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE >> > > is 15. >> > >> > Yeah, it was an incomplete fix. I sent the other half here, but it fell >> > through the cracks: >> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230204184307.never.825-k...@kernel.org/ >> >> Thanks for bringing this to our attention, yeah this definitely just looks >> like it got missed somewhere down the line. It looks like Karol responded >> already so I assume the patch is in the pipeline now, but let me know if >> there's anything else you need. >> > >uhm, I didn't push anything, but I can push it through drm-misct asap, >just wanted to ask if somebody wants to pick a quicker route. But I >guess not?
If you can pick it up, that would be great. There's no rush. :) -- Kees Cook
