On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 2:31 AM Ben Skeggs <skeg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com>
>
> This can be completely normal in some situations (ie. non-stall intrs
> when nothing is waiting on them).
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bske...@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/intr.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/intr.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/intr.c
> index e20b7ca218c3..36a747f0039e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/intr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/intr.c
> @@ -212,8 +212,8 @@ nvkm_intr(int irq, void *arg)
> list_for_each_entry(intr, &device->intr.intr, head) {
> for (leaf = 0; leaf < intr->leaves; leaf++) {
> if (intr->stat[leaf]) {
> - nvkm_warn(intr->subdev, "intr%d:
> %08x\n",
> - leaf, intr->stat[leaf]);
> + nvkm_debug(intr->subdev, "intr%d:
> %08x\n",
> + leaf, intr->stat[leaf]);
> nvkm_intr_block_locked(intr, leaf,
> intr->stat[leaf]);
> }
> }
> --
> 2.40.1
>
Reviewed-by: Karol Herbst <kher...@redhat.com>
