On Wed Nov 19, 2025 at 3:51 PM JST, John Hubbard wrote: > On 11/18/25 10:47 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Wed Nov 19, 2025 at 3:34 PM JST, John Hubbard wrote: >>> On 11/18/25 6:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>>> On Sat Nov 15, 2025 at 8:30 AM JST, Timur Tabi wrote: >>>>> Define some more GPU registers used to boot GSP-RM on Turing and GA100. >>>> >>>> Nit (for the patch title): these are falcon registers, we just happen to >>>> use them for booting the GSP. Also IIUC most of them also exist outside >>>> of Turing. >>> >>> hmmm, falcon registers are *also* GPU registers, though. You arrive here >>> via the GPU's PCIe BAR0. So I'm not sure there is anything wrong with >>> Timur's patch title, right? >> >> I was referring to the email subject (which I should have quoted for >> clarity): "gpu: nova-core: add Turing boot registers" > > Yes. But what's really wrong with that? You can't boot up Turing without > booting up its GSP, which is accessed through registers that could > reasonably be referred to as GPU boot registers. > > I don't really think the patch title misleads, does it?
I interpreted the title as "these registers exist on Turing only", but it is indeed subject to interpretation. In any case it is a non-important nit, so feel free to ignore if it parses fine.
