On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 3:39 AM John Hubbard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> samples/rust (pr_*!) 29 6 83%
2 of these 6 are expected, 4 aren't (`cont` level follows).
I have had a good first issue for these:
https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1139
I just added a few more pointers to see if it helps people
contributing, and also a link to your table since it is a recent
search.
I also linked our other issue about having a `checkpatch` warning for
this, since most (but not all) should be finished in `\n`:
https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/issues/1140
and the patch that would be nice to review/test/revive to see if we
can manage to land it:
https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/[email protected]/
(Or we do something like our past ksquirrel bot which is probably just
easier, to be honest)
Cheers,
Miguel
