On 1/9/26 10:11 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Thu, 2026-01-08 at 18:53 -0800, John Hubbard wrote:
It may have its own imperfections, but this is *approximately* what I'd
prefer (below). I believe that it strikes the right balance between
simplicity and Rust idiomatic code--and it's not any larger than what
you started with.
And it won't cost you any time to implement, since this already works:
Do you realize that this is almost identical to my V1 of this patchset? We've
come full circle.
I hope I didn't review that one in detail. This is really pretty funny. :)
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
