On Thu Feb 19, 2026 at 4:44 PM CET, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
>
> On 2/19/2026 10:27 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 12:21:56PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
>>> On Wed Feb 18, 2026 at 9:55 PM CET, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>>> +RUST TO C LIST INTERFACES
>>> Maybe this should just be "RUST [FFI]" instead (in case Alex and you want to
>>> sign up for looking after FFI helper infrastructure in general)?
>>
>> Good idea, done.
>
> Actually, I am not sure we want to commit to entire RUST FFI infra though its
> pretty tiny right now. Most of this infra right now is clist, let us start
> with
> keeping it as is "RUST TO C LIST INTERFACES" ? Or we could make it "C LIST
> INTERFACES [RUST]" sections.
I feel like it makes a bit more sense to have an entry for the entire class of
"RUST [FFI]" infrastructure.
I could imagine that we will find quite some more cases where an FFI abstraction
layer makes sense; at some point it might even go the other way around.
Once that happens, I think it would be good to have people looking after
intermediate FFI layers in general. But it does not have to be you of course.
Maybe we can create the "RUST [FFI]" entry already with the following
constraint:
RUST [FFI]
M: Joel Fernandes <[email protected]> (CLIST)
M: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]> (CLIST)
L: [email protected]
S: Maintained
F: rust/kernel/ffi/
