On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 11:17:45PM +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: > for above reasons i strongly encourage you to go on with the nova > project. and i also hope, that you take the chance to avoid such > troubles beforehand. what i think could be important, is to have some > guidelines about external naming (which is probably the main source of > all troubles in the pd world).
I would just like to second this wholeheartedly, and lend my encouragement too! I think Nova is already on a stronger footing because: * The lead maintainer understands open source development, and the tools and processes that go with that. * The lead maintainer has already shown a willingness to communicate ideas about his software frequently and reliably, and to take on board and discuss the ideas of others. Also for these reasons I don't think that external naming issues (or many of the other issues that plague Pd) will be a big problem at all when it comes to the crunch. > i am looking forward to the day, where i can switch from pd to nova. The day I can 'apt-get install nova' is the day that I will start testing and using it heavily (sorry, I am lazy, but thank you for all of your hard work so far). Best, Chris. ------------------- http://mccormick.cx _______________________________________________ nova-dev mailing list [email protected] http://klingt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nova-dev http://tim.klingt.org/nova
