> In the main patch, creating two subpatches [p sub1] and [p sub 2], with > this in each one hangs Nova: > [declare bus foo] > > I wanted to create two local buses with the same name in two different > subpatches. Am I doing something wrong?
no, i am not handling an error, yet ... the binding hierarchy is based to patches, but not to subpatches ... so, when you declare two objects of the same name and type, in different subpatches, they are added to the same point in the hierarchy (i must admit, i am not sure yet, if it is better to relate the binding hierarchy to the patch hierarchy or to the canvas hierarchy) > That said, how do I create a local bus in a abstraction based on one of > its creation arguments? well, that seems to be related to the question about abstraction arguments, that i forgot to answer: there is a way to resolve abstraction arguments similar to pd's $X, which is #X. i haven't had a look at this feature for quite some time now, but iirc, #X statements are not composable, so creating symbols like #X-mybus is not possible ... i will need to think a bit more about this issue, though ... > Sorry if I ask too much stupid questions. sorry that there is no really good documentation, yet ... cheers, tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://tim.klingt.org The only people for me are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved, desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn, like fabulous yellow roman candles exploding like spiders across the stars and in the middle you see the blue centerlight pop and everybody goes "Awww! Jack Kerouac
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ nova-dev mailing list [email protected] http://klingt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nova-dev http://tim.klingt.org/nova
