Jay, On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote:
> Have we considered using UUID or some sort of URI as the unique > identifier for instances (and other objects in the system)? Seems to > me that the existing methods (str_id and similar) are trying to > reinvent the primary key wheel somewhat for each API namespace. Why > not use UUID or URI and be done with it? In other words, completely > scrap the idea of using auto-incrementing keys... > As long as an identifier exists per instance that is translatable to and from both API ID formats (so you can create an instance in API 1 and consume it in API 2), I think this is a fine idea. IANADBA though, so there may be arguments in the other direction that I'm not aware of. Michael Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message (including any attached or embedded documents) is intended for the exclusive and confidential use of the individual or entity to which this message is addressed, and unless otherwise expressly indicated, is confidential and privileged information of Rackspace. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at [email protected], and delete the original message. Your cooperation is appreciated.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nova Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nova More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
