I believe it is simpler integration with a legacy network in which all switches are not running OF.

Hi,

What is the motivation for hop-by-hop routing?  Does seems novel in
some aspects.

Regards
KK

On 24 February 2010 13:52, Martin Casado <[email protected]> wrote:
From Natasha:

"I'm wondering if maybe the server is showing up on hpsw3, and so the packet
is first getting routed there, and then re-routed again when it reaches
hpsw1. This is probably a result of all the authenticator code commented out
that was making it depend on routing.  It's in a couple places (wherever the
word "routing" is used)."

This is likely the culprit.  Currently Nox 0.6 is doing hop-by-hop routing
rather then setting up the full path.  Can you search for routing_mode in
authenticator.hh, authenticator_modify.cc and authenticator_util.cc,
uncomment the code and see if this fixes the problem?

I notice that the routing module is behaving differently with NOX0.6
causing each switch en route to generate independent packet_ins, while
NOX0.4 generates only 1 packet_in. This behavior incurs higher flow
setup time.

I have a topology of client <-> hpsw3 <-> hpsw1 <-> server . I
performed a wget operation from client to server. Following is the
control traffic sent/received by the controller (Timestamp was what my
tcpdump captured):

   1266984715.446715   PACKET_IN   hpsw3
   1266984715.446895   FLOW_MOD    hpsw3
   1266984715.446936   PACKET_OUT  hpsw3

   1266984715.452756   PACKET_IN   hpsw1
   1266984715.452913   FLOW_MOD    hpsw1
   1266984715.452937   PACKET_OUT  hpsw1

Ideally, I would've expected to see the controller to push out the
second FLOW_MOD soon enough (and not 6 ms after the PACKET_OUT).

When I use NOX0.4, the action sequence is:
   1266987591.116579    PACKET_IN    hpsw3
   1266987591.116725    FLOW_MOD     hpsw3
   1266987591.116755    FLOW_MOD     hpsw1
   1266987591.116787    PACKET_OUT   hpsw3

Any idea if there is a code change?

Thanks
Srini.

_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org

_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org



_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev_noxrepo.org

Reply via email to