Thanks kk.
I think I did what you suggested:
*uint32_t ds; //duration_sec
uint64_t pc; //packet_count
uint16_t pri; //priority
uint64_t bc; //byte_count
uint16_t len; //legth
uint8_t tid; //table_id
for(int i=0;i<fsie.flows.size();i++){
lg.dbg("i value: %d",i);
ds = ntohl(fsie.flows.at(i).duration_sec);
pc = ntohl(fsie.flows.at(i).packet_count);
pri = ntohl(fsie.flows.at(i).priority);
bc = ntohl(fsie.flows.at(i).byte_count);
len = ntohl(fsie.flows.at(i).length);
tid = ntohl(fsie.flows.at(i).table_id);
lg.dbg("duration_sec: %"PRIu32,ds);
lg.dbg("packet_count: %"PRIu64,pc);
lg.dbg("priority: %"PRIu16,pri);
lg.dbg("byte_count: %"PRIu64,bc);
lg.dbg("length: %"PRIu16,len);
lg.dbg("table_id: %"PRIu8,tid);
}
*
But now only number of flows and duration in seconds are non-zero:
*00238|newcomp|DBG:Size of flows: 2
00239|newcomp|DBG:i value: 0
00240|newcomp|DBG:duration_sec: 8
00241|newcomp|DBG:packet_count: 0
00242|newcomp|DBG:priority: 0
00243|newcomp|DBG:byte_count: 0
00244|newcomp|DBG:length: 0
00245|newcomp|DBG:table_id: 0
00246|newcomp|DBG:i value: 1
00247|newcomp|DBG:duration_sec: 7
00248|newcomp|DBG:packet_count: 0
00249|newcomp|DBG:priority: 0
00250|newcomp|DBG:byte_count: 0
00251|newcomp|DBG:length: 0
00252|newcomp|DBG:table_id: 0
*What am I missing?
Sorry to bother.
Regards.
2011/3/20 kk yap <[email protected]>
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> I mean the result. Did you run ntoh<x> on them.
>
> Regards
> KK
>
> On 20 March 2011 10:50, Ricardo Bennesby <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Hi kk, thanks for quick reply.
> >
> > I changed request.match.wildcards = htonl(0xffffffff) to:
> >
> > request.match.wildcards = htons(0xffffffff); -> but it didn't work.
> Nothing
> > was printed about the packets
> >
> > request.match.wildcards = ntohs(0xffffffff); -> the same that happened
> with
> > htons
> >
> > request.match.wildcards = ntohl(0xffffffff); -> the same result of use
> htonl
> >
> > Sorry kk, but still I missing something?
> >
> > 2011/3/20 kk yap <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Hi Ricardo,
> >>
> >> Did you consider network/host byte order?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> KK
> >>
> >> On 20 March 2011 10:01, Ricardo Bennesby <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi.
> >> >
> >> > I am running a C++ component that prints statistics of flows collected
> >> > in
> >> > switches with the flow_stats_in_event.
> >> > I am also running the dpctl dump-flows command in mininet to compare
> the
> >> > values and they are very different.
> >> >
> >> > The request is as follows:
> >> > request.table_id = 0xff;
> >> > request.out_port = OFPP_NONE;
> >> > request.match.wildcards = htonl(0xffffffff);
> >> >
> >> > Some values printed with dpctl dump-flows are:
> >> > cookie=0, duration_sec=6s, table_id=1, priority=32768, n_packets=9,
> >> > n_bytes=882
> >> > And it seems correct.
> >> >
> >> > In Flow_stats_in_event handler I wrote:
> >> > if(fsie.flows.size()>0){
> >> > lg.dbg("duration_sec:
> >> > %"PRIu32,fsie.flows.at(0).duration_sec);
> >> > lg.dbg("packet_count:
> >> > %"PRIu64,fsie.flows.at(0).packet_count);
> >> > lg.dbg("priority: %"PRIu16,fsie.flows.at
> (0).priority);
> >> > lg.dbg("byte_count:
> >> > %"PRIu64,fsie.flows.at(0).byte_count);
> >> > lg.dbg("length: %d",fsie.flows.at(0).length);
> >> > lg.dbg("table_id: %d",fsie.flows.at(0).table_id);
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > But the values printed are:
> >> > 00533|openflow-event|DBG:received stats reply from 000000000001
> >> > 00534|newcomp|DBG:Size of flows: 2
> >> > 00535|newcomp|DBG:duration_sec: 922746880
> >> > 00536|newcomp|DBG:packet_count: 7710162562058289152
> >> > 00537|newcomp|DBG:priority: 128
> >> > 00538|newcomp|DBG:byte_count: 17737427132398698496
> >> > 00539|newcomp|DBG:length: 24576
> >> > 00540|newcomp|DBG:table_id: 1
> >> >
> >> > What am I missing?
> >> > If I wasn't detailed enough please let me know.
> >> >
> >> > Best Regards.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Ricardo Bennesby da Silva
> >> > Ciência da Computação - UFAM
> >> > LabCIA - Laboratório de Computação Inteligente e Autonômica
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > nox-dev mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev
> >> >
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ricardo Bennesby da Silva
> > Ciência da Computação - UFAM
> > LabCIA - Laboratório de Computação Inteligente e Autonômica
> >
> >
>
--
Ricardo Bennesby da Silva
Ciência da Computação - UFAM
LabCIA - Laboratório de Computação Inteligente e Autonômica
_______________________________________________
nox-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://noxrepo.org/mailman/listinfo/nox-dev
