Ah yes, the old "Microsoft didn't tell us the correct stuff" ploy. I know it well ;-)
Thanks Scott. On 01/03/03 6:13pm you wrote... > >>Brian, I am not sure that Scott said he had the positive/negative ready >yet. > >This is the first I've heard of an issue with negative return values. > >However, it appears there was a glitch in the code (thanks to Microsoft >reporting that the exit code should be an unsigned long, rather than a >signed long). There is a new interim release (same URL) that takes care of >this issue. > >The new feature is that "greater than" and "less than", which will be in >the next beta (and is in the interim release, as usual). > -Scott > >--- >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus >(http://www.declude.com)] > >com)] > >--- >[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] > > >Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ >Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Solid Oak Software] Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/nox-list%40mail.noxmail.com/ Removal address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
