----- "Wendy Smoak" <wsm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Lars Corneliussen > <m...@lcorneliussen.de> wrote: > > > for several reasons I'd suggest to release a 1.3.1 soon. > > Release early, release often. :) I think we're waiting on a vote or > two for 1.3.0, so it would seem reasonable to either finish that up > first, or decide to abandon it. (Would the current infrastructure > support having two staged releases at one time?) Either way, I > wouldn't expect it to be too long before the next one, as you noted, > there are already plenty of fixes. > > -- > Wendy
Hi Wendy, there is a problem with deleting staged releases with our current infrastructure at the moment. I agree with doing a quick release. Since the major issues for 2.0 won't be done yet I think doing a 1.3.1 would be great. On another note I think the votes that are needed for 1.3 to be official are votes from you Wendy and Gavin's. If everyone is fine with this, we could take the resolved issues for 2.0 as of now and move them to 1.3.1-incubating, any thoughts? Cheers, Joe
