it was an error that got irrelevant with the removal of uac in 1.3-incubating.
so, somehow it was resolved in context of 1.3. but this is not enough for listing it in the release notes maybe. as we have 'Backlog', we could add an 'Archive'. -- Message sent from mobile device Am 14.03.2011 um 06:45 schrieb Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>: > +1 (or maybe "Codeplex") > > This raises an interesting question going forward though: I noticed you > resolved one as "not a problem", as of "1.3-incubating". Was this for the > same reason? > > The problem there is that it results in altering historical release notes, > and making a subset of issues appear in release notes that you don't > necessarily want. Any suggestions on how to approach that? > > - Brett > > On 11/03/2011, at 6:03 PM, Lars Corneliussen wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the planning board for "Unscheduled" would be much more tidy, if fixed >> issues would be moved to some version. >> I suggest "< 1.3-incubating" or "prior to 1.3-incubating". >> >> Then we can try to have all issues planned for some version, or at least in >> backlog. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/VersionBoard.jspa >> >> - >> Lars > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > > > >
