Filed issue -> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-383

Thanks,

--

liit

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Lars Corneliussen <[email protected]>wrote:

> I hate when group ids change :)
>
> But org.apache.npanday is a better one :) So i'm all 4 it.
>
> Could we also eliminate the extra groupids for plugins/netplugins i.e.
>
> --
> Message sent from mobile device
>
> Am 25.03.2011 um 05:18 schrieb Brett Porter <[email protected]>:
>
> >
> > On 25/03/2011, at 2:50 PM, Adelita Padilla wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Everyone,
> >>
> >>
> >> In the last release (1.3-incubating), the deployed artifacts were not
> >> synched to central and it's because of the groupId (which was
> "npanday").
> >>
> >>
> >> So before we proceed we the next release, we are proposing to change the
> >> groupId from "npanday" to "org.apache.npanday".
> >>
> >>
> >> Any comments/suggestions/reactions?
> >
> > I think it's important to do, we just need to be aware of the
> implications. Plugin versions will no longer be mediated. Initially I wanted
> to wait until 2.0 (as perhaps we could trim the list of plugins needed
> anyway). However, I don't have any confidence in being able to get the
> existing group ID into central and I think the additional repositories are
> being a pain.
> >
> > However, I'll also note that the RDF artifacts aren't in central either,
> so there is still configuration needed there anyway. If others feel strongly
> that we shouldn't change for this release (and just not sync to central),
> then I'm ok with that.
> >
> > - Brett
> >
> >
> > --
> > Brett Porter
> > [email protected]
> > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/
> > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to