Hi Lars, Those requirements look good to me.
While I prefer that approach, I wonder if it might become too complicated in some projects. I'm still curious if there is a usecase for NPANDAY-244 to provide a simpler (though less rich) build mechanism that effectively delegates to msbuild, then allows NPanday users to augment it with some dependency/distribution management and the execution of additional plugins in the lifecycle. Cheers, Brett (BTW, dropping -users CC - to avoid cross-posting it might be better just to point them to the -dev@ thread in future) On 22/11/2011, at 3:34 AM, Lars Corneliussen wrote: > Hello dear NPanday users and developers, > > we think of reimplementing the integration with MSbuild since the current > solution is quite fragile and erroneous. > > I have started to document my thoughts here and i'd be really happy to get > feedback from you all! Especially I'd like to hear if, and how, you use the > current MSBuild plugin. > > Please anwer to this Mail, or even better, write a comment on the issue. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NPANDAY-486 > > _ > Lars > Apache NPanday Committer -- Brett Porter [email protected] http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter
