Hi Roman,

Raphael Bircher signed up as a mentor in late 2013.

Currently we have noone "investing" in the project. Brett and I do from time to 
time implement new features we need, do fixes whenever we (or our customers) 
get stuck.

We also have some people providing patches here and then - but it's the same 
for them - they do it, when they get stuck.

I think nearby everyone is using 1.5.0-SNAPSHOT at the moment anyway. It could 
just be released - even with bugs and regression issues.

I don't really know how to do the release, and Brett doesn't either find the 
time, I guess :-)

Still I see a good future for NPanday. The "official" Microsoft alternatives 
are just too bad. But still it's hard to convince Microsoft-people to have a 
look at NPanday - they get scared when the hear the word "java". :-)
_
Lars

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Deng 
Ching-Mallete
Gesendet: Freitag, 13. Juni 2014 05:46
An: npanday-dev
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: NPanday incubator report

Hi Roman,

My apologies, I didn't see your email immediately. Unfortunately, I am no 
longer an active mentor for NPanday. I've already stepped down as mentor for 
the project over a year ago so I am not quite up to date with what's happening 
on the project.

I took a quick look now at the Jira and commit notifications, and the last 
commit was on April 4. There were also a number of tickets reported in the 
recent weeks, but there doesn't seem to be anyone actively working on them.
Hope this somewhat helps!

Thanks,
Deng

On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:18 AM, David Akehurst <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I hope the project has not gone dormant.
> > I still actively use it, and hoping for its continued development 
> > and eventual (soon) promotion from incubating.
>
> At the very minimum the project would require some active mentors. 
> Hang in there -- we'll try to resolve this at IPMC level.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>

Reply via email to