New question #138347 on New Real Time Battle: https://answers.launchpad.net/nrtb/+question/138347
A few days ago I sent POCO (pocoproject.org) out to the core team for review and so far have received little feedback. I'm ready to start coding on the transceiver, which will be used by both SimEngine and Databroker and a quick decision is needed so I can go forward. Question: Is there any reason POCO is unacceptable the core support library set for our C++ components? Overview: http://pocoproject.org/documentation/PoCoOverview.pdf Documentation: http://pocoproject.org/docs/ NOTE: In the absence of feedback by 1800 on 2010-12-20 I will mark this question as resolved and proceed with development using POCO on my authority as project lead. I'd much rather have a group consensus, but I don't want to hold up development too much longer. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of NRTB Core, which is an answer contact for New Real Time Battle. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nrtb-core Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nrtb-core More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
