Nguyen,

I try in this post to sum up and explicit the main differences between the approach proposed by R.Aguero et al. in their how-to and ours with the MW-Node. I hope it helps you choosing what better fits your needs.


1) R.Aguero et al., "Adding Multiple Interface Support in NS-2" (document, http://personales.unican.es/aguerocr)

This document describes changes to enable support of multiple interfaces. By to support multiple interfaces they mean to allow to have more than one wireless stack below a single routing agent on a MobileNode. All the wireless stacks are identical (same Mac/Phy). The routing agent code has to be modified to handle more than one wireless stack. This applies only to AODV-like routing agents, that is routing agents using the standard MobileNode, not the SRNode (DSR) or the AODVUUNode (AODV-UU) for example.

This functionality is basically what is provided by Hyacinth (http://www.ecsl.cs.sunysb.edu/multichannel/), some flexibility added. To this respect their contribution is to me very similar to the resources available at http://www.cse.msu.edu/~wangbo1/ns2/nshowto8.html


2) Module-based Wireless Node (MW-Node patch + documentation, http://www.q2s.ntnu.no/~paquerea/ns.html)

In the following, I focus on the main features of the MW-Node. For implementation details and design choices please refer to the documentation.

A MW-Node is a standard Node (not a MobileNode) with capabilities - wireless, mobility, (energy support, not functional yet) - added by means of modules.

The purpose of this new design of wireless and mobile networking support in ns2 is twofold:
- to support new features such as multiple channels/multiple interfaces, and
- to provide a common basis for implementation of any wireless routing protocol instead of having each routing protocol as a particular case (not to say a particular node object) as it is with the MobileNode.

We distinguish between:
- multiple channels: one single routing object handling several wireless interfaces possibly on different channels, and - multiple interfaces: several interfaces, possibly of different types (e.g different Mac/Phy), with one routing object handling one interface.

Following these definitions, R.Aguero et al. how-to discusses multiple channels support only, not multiple interfaces support. The MW-Node supports both. Note that routing agents cannot be used directly with the MW-Node, even in the case of a node with a single interface, and need to be converted. Some guidelines are provided in the documentation.

Also, the layout of the MW-Node differs from the layout of a standard MobileNode and therefore from the layout proposed by R.Aguero et al. In the MW-Node, the routing object lies before the address classifier. This is to enforce that data packets pass through the routing object. This is not the case with a standard MobileNode at the destination or at a portal (wired-wireless) node.

Finally, a new network interface object is provided and enables:
- per interface operation control (e.g. bring up/down one of two interfaces only)
- better wired/wireless integration.


Regards,

Laurent Paquereau
Q2S Centre of Excellence, NTNU

Nguyen Lan wrote:
Hello,

I read your post on ns2 mailing list and I have a question what are the differences between your approach and Ramon's approach. Can you give me a suggestion in the case that I like to make a simulation with multi-interface in ns2: which approach is better or easier to implement.

Cheers,
Nguyen

Laurent Paquereau wrote:

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ramón,

I have been reading your how-to and as your statements and concerns are quite similar to a subset of those we presented last year in [1], you might find interesting reading this paper.

[1] Laurent Paquereau and Bjarne E. Helvik, "A Module-based Wireless Node for ns-2", in Proceedings of the first Workshop on NS2: the IP network simulator (WNS2), Pisa, Italy, 2006.

A Module-based Wireless Node (MW-Node) is a Node with wireless and mobile capabilities added by means of modules. It is not a new node object derived from Node. Rather it is a new layout of mostly existing components. The aim is to provide a flexible support for wireless and mobile networking and in particular:
* support for multiple interfaces/multiple channels, and
* a common basis for the implementation of wireless routing protocols.

The code is distributed as a patch for ns-2.30 and is now available online with the documentation at: http://www.q2s.ntnu.no/~paquerea/ns.html

Feedback and comments are much appreciated.

Best regards,

Laurent Paquereau
Q2S Centre of Excellence, NTNU


Ramon Aguero wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> We have seen a lot of requests about the possibility to extend the NS-2
> framework to support multiple interfaces. Although there is some
> information available, according to the messages that have been sent to
> this list, it seems that a more thorough description may be required.
>
> In this sense, after performing an analysis about existing activities in > this topic, we have created a document that tries to summarize which are
> the required changes to be performed within the different pieces of the
> simulator (tcl, c++) as well as how routing protocols can be adapted to
> make use of the new feature. The howto is entitled "Adding Multiple
> Interface Support in NS-2" and it has been written by my colleague Jesús
> Pérez and myself.
>
> I’ve uploaded the document, which can be retrieved from the following url: > <http://personales.unican.es/aguerocr>http://personales.unican.es/aguerocr
>
> We will be happy to receive any feedback, comments, so as to improve the > howto, since we would like to have it like a living document, adding new
> features as they are available.
>
> Best regards,
> Ramón
>
> ========================================
> Ramón Agüero Calvo
> Dept. of Communications Engineering
> Network Planning & Mobile Communications
> Laboratory
> University of Cantabria
> Avda Castros s/n
> 39005 - Santander
> SPAIN
> ramon at tlmat.unican.es
> Tel: +34 942 201 392 (Ext 14)
> Fax: +34 942 201 488
> ========================================



Reply via email to