On Jan 5, 2008 11:41 AM, pathap subbu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello folks, > I would appreciate if anyone helps me with this format from > newdsdv-energy.tr, I obtained using the wireless-newnode-energy.tcl > "N -t 0.007961 -n 47 -e 0.009798 " > kalyan,grad student > univ of north texas,USA > > On Jan 4, 2008 7:00 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Send Ns-users mailing list submissions to > > [email protected] > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/ns-users > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > > than "Re: Contents of Ns-users digest..." > > > > > > Today's Topics: > > > > 1. A question regarding overhead for CBR over UDP (skumar3) > > 2. Re: transmission range (Song Luo) > > 3. transmission range (muhamad faiz arief budianto) > > 4. Re: transmission range (Ehsan Bagherian) > > 5. Re: Problems with the WiMAX NIST patch (JawadZaheer) > > 6. Re: problems with the NIST WiMAX patch (JawadZaheer) > > 7. Re: transmission range (Song Luo) > > 8. Re: transmission range (muhamad faiz arief budianto) > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Message: 1 > > Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:46:56 -0800 (PST) > > From: skumar3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: [ns] A question regarding overhead for CBR over UDP > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > > While simulating CBR over UDP at the trace file I get the message size > > to be > > the same as the size of the cbr packet.The overhead due to UDP and IP( > > 28 > > bytes) is not reflected in the trace file but while using TCP the > > overhead > > is shown.Why is this so?I appreciate your reply. > > > > Thanks, > > Sarvesh > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/A-question-regarding-overhead-for-CBR-over-UDP-tp14605768p14605768.html > > Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 2 > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:26:24 -0500 > > From: "Song Luo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ns] transmission range > > To: "muhamad faiz arief budianto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Message-ID: > > < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > > > > > that's also what I want to know. If you find a solution, please share > > with > > > me. Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 31, 2007 10:05 PM, muhamad faiz arief budianto < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > how can i set or define each node to have different transmission > > range? > > > > i think i should change the *Phy*/WirelessPhy parameter. > > > > but it just works for all nodes. I want it just work for some node. > > > > I already try to use the hierarchy transmission, like from wired to > > > > wireless > > > > (different cluster) > > > > but it's stuck!!! > > > > > > > > Please help!!!! > > > > > > > > -- > > > > jho > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Song Luo > > > Intelligent Automation, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Song Luo > > Intelligent Automation, Inc. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 3 > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:56:05 +0700 > > From: "muhamad faiz arief budianto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: [ns] transmission range > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > > > i think, actually we can't set our transmission range on each node, > > without > > changing or hack the code from ns. > > for now i just set my sensitivity node (RXthre, CST, etc). and set it > > manually just right before we create the nodes. > > I already make some simple simulation, for trying some kind of wireless > > sensor sims u can say . > > It has 25 node and have 3 kind of node. > > 1 node for the HOST (80 m range) > > 7 node for the MIDDLE (50 m range) > > 17 node for the END (30 m range) > > the data can travel just from the node that already on it's range. > > > > the scenario is, the field is just like war field, so i have to send > > data > > packet from node 13 to 0 (END to HOST). > > i disabled the movement. just try it n give me some feedback about the > > range > > from each node. > > If you want more clearly about the range transmission, i draw the field > > and > > node deployment with some design software (CORELDRAW). > > -- > > jho > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 4 > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 08:14:03 -0800 (PST) > > From: Ehsan Bagherian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ns] transmission range > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > > > hi > > > > you can change node configurataion many times in your tcl code and > > define nodes in belw of node configurataion definition, also you can change > > Pt_ and RXThresh_ for transmit and recieve ranges > > > > Ehsan B, > > > > --------------------------------- > > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 5 > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:22:28 -0800 (PST) > > From: JawadZaheer < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ns] Problems with the WiMAX NIST patch > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > > hi guys > > I have finally come up with the solution to this problem. > > Upon installation of the wimax module either by patch or manual > > installation. > > Recompile the code from the ns-2.31 directory by > > ./configure > > make clean > > make > > make install > > > > Probably you aren't doing the "make install" and that is the reason for > > the > > error. > > best of luck. > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-the-WiMAX-NIST-patch-tp9643630p14622164.html > > > > Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 6 > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:33:31 -0800 (PST) > > From: JawadZaheer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ns] problems with the NIST WiMAX patch > > To: [email protected] > > Message-ID: < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > > > > > I have solved the problem. > > >From ns-2.31 directory > > ./configure > > make clean > > make > > make install > > > > Probably you guys are missing the "make instal"l command. > > > > Best of luck > > -- > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/problems-with-the-NIST-WiMAX-patch-tp9648357p14622470.html > > Sent from the ns-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 7 > > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 16:10:53 -0500 > > From: "Song Luo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ns] transmission range > > To: "muhamad faiz arief budianto" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Message-ID: > > < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > Can you give more detail on how you manually set node sensitivities > > right > > before creating nodes? Do you write your code in C++ files? which C++ or > > tcl > > files did you modify? And what are the statements? Maybe an example or > > the > > files you are currently using can better illustrates. If possible, can > > you > > send me your simulation script and modified source files, I am very > > interested in giving it a shot. > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:56 AM, muhamad faiz arief budianto < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > i think, actually we can't set our transmission range on each node, > > > without > > > changing or hack the code from ns. > > > for now i just set my sensitivity node (RXthre, CST, etc). and set it > > > manually just right before we create the nodes. > > > I already make some simple simulation, for trying some kind of > > wireless > > > sensor sims u can say . > > > It has 25 node and have 3 kind of node. > > > 1 node for the HOST (80 m range) > > > 7 node for the MIDDLE (50 m range) > > > 17 node for the END (30 m range) > > > the data can travel just from the node that already on it's range. > > > > > > the scenario is, the field is just like war field, so i have to send > > data > > > packet from node 13 to 0 (END to HOST). > > > i disabled the movement. just try it n give me some feedback about the > > > range > > > from each node. > > > If you want more clearly about the range transmission, i draw the > > field > > > and > > > node deployment with some design software (CORELDRAW). > > > -- > > > jho > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Song Luo > > Intelligent Automation, Inc. > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Message: 8 > > Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 06:09:57 +0700 > > From: "muhamad faiz arief budianto" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ns] transmission range > > To: "Song Luo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Message-ID: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > i have add my script as an attachment in the previous mail > > > > On Jan 5, 2008 4:10 AM, Song Luo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Can you give more detail on how you manually set node sensitivities > > right > > > before creating nodes? Do you write your code in C++ files? which C++ > > or tcl > > > files did you modify? And what are the statements? Maybe an example or > > the > > > files you are currently using can better illustrates. If possible, can > > you > > > send me your simulation script and modified source files, I am very > > > interested in giving it a shot. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > On Jan 4, 2008 10:56 AM, muhamad faiz arief budianto < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i think, actually we can't set our transmission range on each node, > > > > without > > > > changing or hack the code from ns. > > > > for now i just set my sensitivity node (RXthre, CST, etc). and set > > it > > > > manually just right before we create the nodes. > > > > I already make some simple simulation, for trying some kind of > > wireless > > > > sensor sims u can say . > > > > It has 25 node and have 3 kind of node. > > > > 1 node for the HOST (80 m range) > > > > 7 node for the MIDDLE (50 m range) > > > > 17 node for the END (30 m range) > > > > the data can travel just from the node that already on it's range. > > > > > > > > the scenario is, the field is just like war field, so i have to send > > > > data > > > > packet from node 13 to 0 (END to HOST). > > > > i disabled the movement. just try it n give me some feedback about > > the > > > > range > > > > from each node. > > > > If you want more clearly about the range transmission, i draw the > > field > > > > and > > > > node deployment with some design software (CORELDRAW). > > > > -- > > > > jho > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Song Luo > > > Intelligent Automation, Inc. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > jho > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ns-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/ns-users > > > > > > End of Ns-users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 4 > > *************************************** > > > >
