I've already put this following code
if (hdr->direction() == hdr_cmn::UP && hdr->ptype() == PT_SRRP){
sendUp(p);
}
before if(tx_active_ && hdr->error() == 0) and at the end of the method,
followed the debbuger, nothing is wrong, but my agent don't receive the
packets.
Any help else?
Thanks!
Larissa
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:04, Larissa Lucena <[email protected]>wrote:
> Or should I call the Mac::sendUp(Packet* p)? And where I should call it?
>
> - before if(tx_active_ && hdr->error() == 0) ?
> - before if(rx_state_ == MAC_IDLE)?
> - or at the end of the method?
>
> The method Mac802_11::recv is copied below. Thanks again!
>
> Larissa
>
> void
> Mac802_11::recv(Packet *p, Handler *h)
> {
> struct hdr_cmn *hdr = HDR_CMN(p);
> /*
> * Sanity Check
> */
> assert(initialized());
>
> /*
> * Handle outgoing packets.
> */
> if(hdr->direction() == hdr_cmn::DOWN) {
> send(p, h);
> return;
> }
> /*
> * Handle incoming packets.
> *
> * We just received the 1st bit of a packet on the network
> * interface.
> *
> */
>
> /*
> * If the interface is currently in transmit mode, then
> * it probably won't even see this packet. However, the
> * "air" around me is BUSY so I need to let the packet
> * proceed. Just set the error flag in the common header
> * to that the packet gets thrown away.
> */
> if(tx_active_ && hdr->error() == 0) {
> hdr->error() = 1;
> }
>
> if(rx_state_ == MAC_IDLE) {
> setRxState(MAC_RECV);
> pktRx_ = p;
> /*
> * Schedule the reception of this packet, in
> * txtime seconds.
> */
> if (mhProbe_.busy() && OnMinChannelTime) {
> Recv_Busy_ = 1; // Receiver busy indication for Probe Timer
> }
>
>
> mhRecv_.start(txtime(p));
> } else {
> /*
> * If the power of the incoming packet is smaller than the
> * power of the packet currently being received by at least
> * the capture threshold, then we ignore the new packet.
> */
> if(pktRx_->txinfo_.RxPr / p->txinfo_.RxPr >= p->txinfo_.CPThresh) {
> capture(p);
> } else {
> collision(p);
>
> }
> }
> }
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 09:49, Larissa Lucena <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> What I do? Test the kind of packet, and if it might be sent up, call the
>> recv of the mac superclass?
>>
>> I'm seeming kind desperate, no? But I think I really am! LOL
>>
>> Larissa
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 09:24, Larissa Lucena <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks, Lionel! I'll try It now!
>>>
>>> But (still) if anyone had an example e could send me, I'm very gratefull!
>>>
>>> Larissa
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 04:29, Lionel Bertaux <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> If you take a look at thé recv method, you CAN see that packets are sent
>>>> up or down depending on their characteristics. You just have to change the
>>>> conditions needed to send your packet up (like thé packet type in the
>>>> common
>>>> header).
>>>>
>>>> Enjoy.
>>>>
>>>> Lionel Bertaux.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le 3 mars 2010 à 22:15, Larissa Lucena <[email protected]> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 18:11, Larissa Lucena <[email protected]
>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi, there!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to know how to modificate Mac802_11::recv to send up my
>>>>>> application protocol packets. Has anyone an example?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Larissa
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota
>>>>>> diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota
>>>>> diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota
>>> diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota
>> diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota
> diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".
>
--
"O maior prazer do inteligente é bancar o idiota
diante de um idiota que banca o inteligente".
