ok
On Jan 27, 7:15 pm, Google Groups <nsb-ce
[email protected]> wrote:
> A message has been sent to the nsb-ce group and is awaiting approval. We've
> attached this message for your review.
>
> This message requires approval because the message may be spam.
>
> You can approve or reject this message online
> at:http://groups.google.com/group/nsb-ce/pendmsg?hl=en
>
> or
>
> You can approve this message by replying to this email.
>
> Thank you,
>
> The Google Groups Team
>
>
>
> [ Attached Message ]From:Google Groups
> <[email protected]>To:[email protected]:Wed,
> 28 Jan 2009 00:15:11 +0000Local:Tues, Jan 27 2009 7:15 pmSubject:nsb-ce -
> Google Groups: Message Pending
>
> A message has been sent to the nsb-ce group and is awaiting approval. We've
> attached this message for your review.
>
> This message requires approval because the message may be spam.
>
> You can approve or reject this message online
> at:http://groups.google.com/group/nsb-ce/pendmsg?hl=en
>
> or
>
> You can approve this message by replying to this email.
>
> Thank you,
>
> The Google Groups Team
>
>
>
> [ Attached Message ]From:Google Groups
> <[email protected]>To:[email protected]:Wed,
> 28 Jan 2009 00:14:48 +0000Local:Tues, Jan 27 2009 7:14 pmSubject:nsb-ce -
> Google Groups: Message Pending
>
> A message has been sent to the nsb-ce group and is awaiting approval. We've
> attached this message for your review.
>
> This message requires approval because the message may be spam.
>
> You can approve or reject this message online
> at:http://groups.google.com/group/nsb-ce/pendmsg?hl=en
>
> or
>
> You can approve this message by replying to this email.
>
> Thank you,
>
> The Google Groups Team
>
>
>
> [ Attached Message ]From:"Tim Markoski"
> <[email protected]>To:[email protected]:Wed, 28 Jan 2009
> 00:14:35 -0000Local:Tues, Jan 27 2009 7:14 pmSubject:[nsbasic-ce] Re: problem
> with orientation switching
>
> The first question is how are you storing the current screen status?
>
> If you are using the Registry, you may find a setting that deals with
> the hardware issue.
> Every WM6 distro is essentially a custom version.
>
> It's worth contacting the device maker.
>
> --- In [email protected], "rmrsoft" <a...@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I am having a very frustrating with implementing automatic
> > landscape/portrait switching. (Sorry for the long post)
>
> > To do this I have created an OUTPUT_SIZE routine, and it uses this
> > logic (not the exact code of course)
>
> > Sub Output_Size
> > If NewFormat=OldFormat then exit sub
> > Check Output_Height and Output_Width
> > Resize and move all screen objects
> > Refresh the screen
> > OldFormat=NewFormat
> > End Sub
>
> > Now this works perfectly on the emulator and on my WM6 IPAQ. But on
> > these the orientation is changed in software by going into Settings >
> > Screen.
>
> > One of my BETA testers has one of the latest generation phones where
> > there is a hardware switch to change the orientation or it switches if
> > they pull out a keyboard. Now he is having two major problems with 5
> > out of 6 of my programs (the 6th one works perfectly):
>
> > 1. The screen does not refresh properly and some of the objects stay
> > in the wrong position.
>
> > 2. If he switches the orientation and then shuts the program down it
> > will not restart. If he checks the 'Running Programs' he finds the
> > program has shut down but NSBasic is still running in the background.
>
> > Now, isolating this routine stops Error 2 from happening, so it seems
> > as though an error is being generated during this routine (but not
> > being reported) that is causing NSBasic to hang and not shutdown.
>
> > Comparing Program 6 to the other 5 programs the only difference was
> > that program 6 was more complex so spent more time doing the routine.
> > And when I added 5 dummy statements to the other 5 programs then
> > Error appeared to be cured and the programs would stop and start
> > correctly. But I still can't cure problem 1.
>
> > As far as I can see the main difference here is that for the emulator
> > and my machine the NSBasic program is sent to the background while the
> > switching is being carried out. In these new machines the program
> > remains in the foreground while this is happening. Because
> > OUTPUT_SIZE is called independently we are in the situation where 2
> > parts of the program are running at the same time, Could this be
> > confusing the system ? Am I missing something obvious ?
>
> > Any help would be appreciated.
>
> > Al
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"nsb-ce" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nsb-ce?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
