I'm not sure how you want to compare, but I did a comparison of my own, just for fun.
I used a WM 5 device, running a 400 mhz processor. First I loaded the NS Basic/CE Benchmark sample. A couple of clicks and it was running on the device. The score was 12632 loops per second. I then did the same program in Visual Studio 2005, using VB.Net. I had to do a few more clicks before I got the result: 1277 loops per second, about 1/10 the speed. I worried the problem might be the version of .NET Compact Framework - it was 1.0 on the device. So I got the 33 meg download from Microsoft's site and installed .NET Compact Framework 3.5 to the device. Rerunning the benchmark resulted in 1290, essentially unchanged. I also compared the size of the programs. The NS Basic version was 6656 bytes, while the .NET version was 8704. This example is almost certainly too trivial to take seriously - but NS Basic is looking pretty good! Has anyone done a more substantial comparison? >Hi All, > >Does anyone have any specs on apps written in NSB-CE versus mobile apps >written in .Net? > >Thanks, >Shaun > > > >------------------------------------ > >Yahoo! Groups Links > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "nsb-ce" group. To post to this group, send email to nsb-ce@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nsb-ce+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nsb-ce?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
