On 21/12/2019 13:01, richard lucassen via nsd-users wrote: Hi Richard,
> I'm looking at NSD now and I think I can use NSD the same way I use > tinydns. The only difference is the "one file contains it all" system, > but that's rather easy to script. Just rsync the zone files and send a > HUP to the supervisor. If a nameserver is not reachable it it will > autmagically synchronise. > > Are there good reasons *not* to use nsd this way? This will not be a > 1000000 queries per second system BTW. This is a perfectly reasonable way to use NSD. In fact, it is somewhat better than using zone transfers between one NSD master and some slaves, because NSD is only able to provide a full AXFR, but not an incremental IXFR. So rsyncing the zones is probably the most efficient. As a side effect, you don't need to arrange for NOTIFY between the servers, nor any kind of XFR ACLs or TSIG keys. Regards, Anand _______________________________________________ nsd-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users
