On Thu, 28 May 2020, Wouter Wijngaards via nsd-users wrote:

I have a suggestion. Maybe just delete this nsd.service file.

Thank you for the suggestion.  Removed it.  Complicated and not useful
is not what I want for a contrib file, instead I would want files in
contrib to be helpful and add to make use of NSD in different
environments easier.

It is also completely different from the one used in fedora or epel/centos.

Yes the removal of IPv6 also seems counterproductive to me.

This all came in via 70346a384 by you as part of the --enable-systemd
patch. It also includes the "socket activation" stuff, eg
contrib/nsd.socket that also makes absolutely no sense for a DNS server
daemon that is expected to always run anyway. And their default is
to activate it via queries received on 127.0.0.1.

Note for fedora/centos, I do not compile with --enable-systemd because
of these reasons, even though I would like to enable the systemd
watchdog part that is part of that feature. Perhaps the socket
activation and software watchdog parts can be split into two different
configure options? (--enable-sd-notify and --enable-sd-socket ?)

Paul
_______________________________________________
nsd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users

Reply via email to