Indeed, thanks Florian! Thanks for all other suggestions too!
Haven't read the whole thread yet, but I do like to point out it's not lack of interest. Wouter makes an excellent point that I hadn't considered yet. Portability and compatibility. I don't know if we still have Solaris users, so I don't know if it'd make their lives harder. One thing I did think of after my response is that if dependencies are changed, we probably want to wait for the next minor (major?) version? I feel we shouldn't make the lives of package maintainers harder by swapping dependencies in a patch version. I'll need to read up on possible tooling etc first to determine what makes sense. - Jeroen On Sat, 2022-12-31 at 20:13 +0100, Jan Stary via nsd-users wrote: > On Dec 31 18:24:42, nsd-users@lists.nlnetlabs.nl wrote: > > This was discussed in 2015: > > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/pipermail/nsd-users/2015-August/002167.html > > Ah, thanks for reminding me :-) > > I just read the whole thread (please do as well) > - AFAICT it led nowhere for lack of interest. > > The only valid point I see there is that Solaris > does not have a formatter for the mdoc(7) language, > which I find hard to beliave (doesn't Solaris have groff?). > But surely that's a moot point now. > > Jan > > _______________________________________________ > nsd-users mailing list > nsd-users@lists.nlnetlabs.nl > https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users _______________________________________________ nsd-users mailing list nsd-users@lists.nlnetlabs.nl https://lists.nlnetlabs.nl/mailman/listinfo/nsd-users
