You're quick.............................. Yes, that was the tongue (non-vibrating and not a cane one) firmly in cheek implication. Unless, of course, we want a really healthy debate with all sorts of points of view showing just how much we care in our own ways about the pipes and their future. If nothing else, this discussion has shown the depth of feeling felt. I, for one, welcome the fact that we can do this. The various points of view have mostly been valid, entertaining and food for thought and it can only be good for piping in general. It's also a great way for those of us who are not in the NE to get to know how other people (especially the "real" pipers who have reached such a high standard) feel as we never (or rarely) have the chance to meet face to face (or chanter to chanter). There, that's enough grovelling for today lest they get even more big-headed (if that's possible). Colin Hill
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Colin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 19, 2006 9:19 PM Subject: Re: [NSP] Re: tutor > On 19 May 2006, Colin (Hill) wrote: > > > Four things never to get into a discussion on. > > > 3/ Bagpipes. > > Hang on! Isn't it a bagpipe discussion list? Should we all > unsubscribe now before we get shot??? > > <grin> > > Julia > > > > To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
