On 9 Apr 2007, Richard Heard wrote: 

>Perhaps I should try to re-assure members
> of the list that I am not trying to pry into anyone's trade secrets.
> I am not interested in conmmercial espionage.

<etc>

Confused list readers may wish to know that this response was itself 
in response to an off-list message of mine which mostly went :

------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you familiar with the concept of a "hot potato"? <grin>
I really, really hope you get some sensible and constructive answers.

To the best of my knowledge only Colin has written down his method. 
Others regard theirs as trade secrets or have simply not got round to 
it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

I also would be interested in accounts of the various methods that 
have been used over the years and are still used today. Different 
people find different ways to approach any problem.

Unfortunately I have found I have to be very careful onlist, 
particular with any humorous answers, since some folk seem unable to 
distinguish between personal opinion (for which I use this email 
address) and when I am speaking as NPS secretary (for which I use my 
"offishul"  email) - even if I specify which I am doing.

Very regrettably there are also a few out there who will use any 
facetious comment I make against the NPS committee in general - it's 
probably the price of putting one's head above the parapet, and 
trying to do a useful job. 

For the record, I would very much welcome a "here's all the methods - 
now you choose" publication, and wonder if the several times 
suggested idea of a reedmaking symposium would be viable as a start, 
even if some folk attend in hope of bloodshed!

Julia



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to