And then there's the electronic version
> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:50:21 +0000
> To: theborderpi...@googlemail.com; nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
> From: j.gibb...@imperial.ac.uk
> Subject: [NSP] Re: Spelling of names
>
>
> Couldn't have been before 1731, as Jack was yet to dance his way to
world stardom...
>
> I'm very impressed the tune - or at least the new title - spread so
wide, so quickly.
>
> Or was he already famous when still a live teenager?
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nsp-request+j.gibbons=ic.ac...@cs.dartmouth.edu
[mailto:nsp-request+j.gibbons=ic.ac...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf Of
Matt Seattle
> Sent: 13 March 2009 12:31
> To: nsp@cs.dartmouth.edu
> Subject: [NSP] Re: Spelling of names
>
> If you read Note 8 in the new edition of Vickers you'll find 13
> different spellings of Jack Lattin's name, and some other unrelated
> titles which became attached to his tune.
>
> Who cares? Well, I care enough to note them as they are the labels
> attached to the versions referred to, but other than that, I'd rather
> discuss the tune. And more than that, I'd rather play it. It was the
> one that got me hooked, and Chris Ormston and Anthony Robb were there
> in the room in Rothbury when it happened. 1985, I think, or was it
> 1733? Wull Allan would have been around, but Jamie was still a
twinkle
> in his Dad's eye.
>
>
>
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>
>
--
