And to make matters worse we're all into parallel bore, which sounds
more repressed than conical bore. Though I suppose being an inverse
conical bore might be worse still.
May I suggest we refer instead to the "Intra-chanter central musical
channel" which apart from being snappy surely removes all possible
misunderstanding or pejorative connotation?
Richard
Francis Wood wrote:
In these occasionally acrimonious times, I do feel there might be some
value in searching critically for the sources of negative influence.
As a start, we might do well to examine the language of piping terms.
That lexicon is in sore need of some enlightened revision. The
following points will, I hope, provide persuasive examples.
To begin with the chanter. 'Bore' has pejorative connotations. I would
not wish to be described in such terms. 'Narrow bore' provides no
enhancement. 'Closed' takes us further down the path of negativity.
And 'closed fingering' is distinctly creepy.
Let us move to 'drones'. A joyless word suggesting tedium and
monotony. In the apian world, the drones produce no honey. Human bores
are said to 'drone on'. The word itself draws negativity into our
playing experience in a way that 'harmony pipes' (to give an example)
would not.
As for 'stocks', that is clearly unfortunate. In historical times,
people were locked up in 'stocks' as a punishment which also seemed
to require the throwing of rotten eggs. The financial usage attracts
further dismay. Are there examples of this word being used in any
pleasant context? I think not.
I am not at all sure that 'blowpipe' is a very proper word. I will
leave that for others to discuss and move on rapidly to the question
of 'bellows'. That word instantly invokes associations with anger,
pain and frustration. Sentiments that are entirely foreign to the
experience of learning and playing the pipes.
Finally, I can suggest nothing at all in defence of the usage of 'bag'
which occupies a prime position in the language of insult.
Our choice of vocabulary is crucial in any collaborative experience.
In the interests of harmonious piping, some critical thinking about
the language we use may be helpful. Any scrutiny of the terms above
would surely suggest that we need alternatives entirely devoid of
distressing connotations.
I invite your comments.
Francis Wood
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
